Photography is not dying. But the deeper understanding of photography — the craft, the print, the patience, the vision, and the joy of working with a proper camera — may need to be rediscovered.

Today, everybody seems to be a photographer, or at least, that is how it appears.

Almost every person carries a camera in their pocket. We photograph our meals, our holidays, our children, our pets, our sunsets, our shoes, our coffee, and sometimes even ourselves more than the world around us. Photography has become instant, convenient and astonishingly accessible.

In that sense, photography is certainly not dying. In fact, one could argue that more photographs are being taken today than at any other time in history.

But perhaps that is not the real question. The more important question might be this: is high-level photography slowly being misunderstood, neglected, or forgotten?

I raise this because, over the past few years, I have had many conversations with camera clubs, photographic societies, and photography groups. I am regularly invited to give talks and discussions, and one thing seems to come up again and again. Many clubs and societies are finding it increasingly difficult to attract new members, especially younger members.

When new people do join, they are often later-career enthusiasts. People who have reached a stage in life where they have a bit more time, a bit more curiosity, and perhaps a desire to explore something meaningful. That is wonderful, of course. But it does make us ask a serious question.

Why are younger people, or even mid-career creatives, not always feeling the need to learn photography properly? Why are fewer people feeling drawn to digital cameras, lenses, printing, clubs, exhibitions, and the deeper craft of photography?

I believe part of the answer lies in a misconception. Many people today believe the phone can do everything. And to be fair, phone cameras are remarkable. They are convenient, intelligent, fast, and increasingly capable. They are excellent tools for documentation, experimentation, visual note-taking, and creative play. I use phone photography myself and appreciate its place in the creative process.

But a phone does not replace serious photography. It underpins it. It can feed it. It can inspire it. It can even become part of an artistic workflow. But it does not remove the need for skill, vision, craft, discipline, and deeper photographic understanding.

The challenge is that we now live in an instant society.

People are battling to concentrate. We scan rather than read. We swipe rather than study. We take quick pictures rather than consider light, composition, timing, depth, printing, presentation, and meaning. We are surrounded by imagery, yet we often spend very little time actually looking.

And perhaps this is where photography has suffered most. Not because fewer photographs are being taken, but because fewer high-quality photographs are being properly considered. We are surrounded by mass visual information at our fingertips, and this breeds an unfortunate habit of scanning, scrolling, and moving on before an image has had a chance to speak.

One of the reasons for this is that we are often working on very small screens. We pinch, zoom, swipe, and glance, but we seldom experience the photograph as a complete piece. We do not stand back from it. We do not let it occupy space. We do not see it as we would if it were printed, framed, and placed on display in a home, office, gallery, or exhibition. And perhaps that is one of the greatest losses of all.

Photography Was Never Intended for a Backlit Screen

Most people today experience photography on a phone, tablet, computer, or social media platform. Instagram, Facebook, online galleries, photography websites, and digital portfolios have become the main way people see photographic work.

These platforms are useful. They inspire us. They allow us to share our work. They connect us across the world.

But they are not the final destination of photography.

In my opinion, photography was never meant to be enjoyed only on a backlit screen.

The difference between viewing a photograph on a phone and seeing it properly printed is a little like the difference between a wonderfully prepared, considered meal placed in front of you and a quick microwave meal pack. Both may serve a purpose, but they are not the same experience. One is convenient and immediate. The other asks you to pause, appreciate, taste, notice, and enjoy.

Photography deserves that same level of consideration. A print on the wall is not just an image. It is an artwork. It has presence. It has scale. It is real. There is texture, weight, atmosphere, and a physical truth that no small screen can fully reproduce.

There is something extraordinary that happens when ink meets paper. Especially today, with archival pigment printing, when the ink settles into the fibres of a beautiful cotton paper. Suddenly the photograph has depth, subtlety, tonal richness, and presence. It becomes something you experience, not merely something you look at.

This is something I see often in our art gallery. People walk in and say, “I have been following your work online,” or “I have seen this on Instagram,” or “I looked at this piece on your website.” But then they stand in front of the actual artwork and say, “I had no idea it looked like this.” This sentence says a lot. It tells us that the screen gave them information, but the print gave them the experience.

We receive similar comments from international clients who have never visited our gallery. They may have seen the work online, chosen to invest in a print, and then only truly understood the artwork when it arrived. Often, once the print is unrolled at the picture framer, we receive a message saying something like, “I didn’t realise it would be so much more beautiful than I expected.”

That is the power of the physical print. Photography, at its highest level, needs to be experienced in person.

The Experience of Holding a Camera

The true joy of photography is not only found in the final print. It is also found in the experience of using the camera itself.

This is where the Ferrari analogy becomes useful. Looking at a photograph online is one thing. But picking up a proper digital camera is something else entirely. Feeling the weight of it in your hands. Looking through the viewfinder. Adjusting the exposure controls. Choosing your aperture. Understanding your shutter speed. Watching how the lens changes perspective. Seeing how depth of field alters the feeling of the image. Working with a RAW file and realising how much control you have after capture.

That is a completely different experience from simply lifting a phone and pressing the screen. A digital camera invites you into the process. It asks you to participate. It asks you to think, choose, interpret and respond. It places the act of creation back into your hands.

“With my eyes, I have vision. But when I hold a camera in my hands, my vision moves from seeing to creating.” — Martin Osner

That is what the camera does. It does not merely record what we see. It gives us a way to shape what we see.

The Power of the Print

This is not only true of modern archival pigment printing. It was equally true in the days of the classic darkroom.

Anyone who has ever worked in a black-and-white darkroom will understand this. There is something almost magical about watching an image slowly appear in the developer. The photograph emerges from the paper as if it has been waiting there all along. Then it is washed, dried, handled, flattened, mounted, framed, and finally placed on a wall. A process that teaches respect and patience.

It teaches that photography is not only about pressing a shutter. It is about craft, interpretation, tone, contrast, paper, chemistry, light, and final presentation.

Whether we are talking about a silver gelatin print from yesterday or an archival pigment print today, the heart of the matter remains the same. Photography becomes truly alive when it is allowed to exist beyond the screen.

The Tools Have Changed, the Methods of Presentation Have Expanded, but the DNA of Photography Remains the Same

Yes, I agree, photography has certainly changed. In the days of film, one could not instantly check the back of the camera. There was uncertainty. There was waiting. There was cost involved in every frame. One had to think carefully before pressing the shutter. Digital photography changed that. The internet changed it again. Social media changed it again. Now artificial intelligence is changing the visual world even further.

But the essence of photography has not changed. Photography is still about light. The quality of light. The direction of light. The intensity of light. The way light reveals, conceals, shapes, softens, hardens, dramatises, and transforms a subject.

Photography is still about seeing. It is still about working through a two-dimensional medium and finding a way to translate the real world into something interesting, meaningful, beautiful, unsettling, poetic, documentary, abstract, or expressive.

The great joy of photography is still about learning how to see, and then learning how to compose and present that vision using all the visual communication tools available to us. Camera angle, distortion, compression, colour, texture, focus, motion, timing, perspective, scale, contrast and mood all become part of the language.

This is why learning photography properly still matters. For someone who feels uncertain about the foundations, a structured course such as Photography Essentials can help build the confidence needed to move beyond guesswork and begin making more intentional photographs.

Once those foundations are understood, the camera becomes even more exciting. It is no longer simply a device. It becomes an instrument.

The Realisation of the Print

One of the clearest moments of truth comes when someone takes a photograph on a phone and believes it is extraordinary. Perhaps it looks wonderful on the screen. The colours pop. The contrast is strong. The small display hides many of the flaws.

Then they decide to print it.

Suddenly, the image tells another story.

What looked sharp on the phone may not hold up in print. What looked dramatic on a small screen may fall apart at scale. What looked like an award-winning image may reveal that there is more to photography than meets the eye.

This is not to criticise phone photography. It is simply to point out that convenience and quality are not always the same thing.

Phone photography will continue to improve. There is no doubt about that. But digital cameras will also continue to develop. Sensors, lenses, dynamic range, resolution, colour depth, and printing processes will keep advancing.

There will always be a difference between convenience and craft.

And there will always be a difference between taking a quick picture and making a photograph.

Vinyl Records, Streaming, and the Soul of Photography

I often think about the difference between digital streaming and vinyl records.

Streaming is convenient. It gives us access to almost every piece of music we could wish for. It is immediate, portable, and useful.

But when you place a vinyl record on a turntable, lower the needle, and sit down to listen, something changes. You give the music your attention. You enter into the experience. The sound has a warmth, a depth, and a cultural richness that asks something of you.

It asks you to slow down.

Photography, when practised properly, does the same.

It asks us to slow down. It gives us a purpose for being there in the first place. It gives us a reason to plan where we are going with the camera, why we are going there, and what we are hoping to explore. It asks us to look again because we have made the conscious time to work properly with the camera and to consider the frame, the light, the subject and the moment.

That is what many people are missing.

Not photography itself, but the experience of photography.

Perfection Can Very Often Become the Enemy of Creativity

One of the things I often say is that perfection is often the enemy of creativity.

This is especially true in photography.

The camera is, in many ways, a perfect device. It can demand technical precision. Correct exposure. Accurate focus. Controlled depth of field. Clean files. Sharp detail. Perfect colour. Perfect timing.

And yes, these things matter. Technical skill is important.

But photography becomes truly exciting when we realise that the same camera can also be used imperfectly, expressively, experimentally, and emotionally.

A musician can play classical music, jazz, blues, rock, or folk on the same instrument. The instrument does not limit the genre. The musician’s imagination opens it up.

The camera is no different.

It can be used to record reality with accuracy, but it can also be used to interpret reality with feeling. It can be sharp and precise, or soft and suggestive. It can be documentary, abstract, impressionistic, symbolic, painterly, quiet, dramatic, or deeply personal.

The problem is not the camera.

The problem is often that we have forgotten how much is possible with it.

For those who already understand the basics and want to take photography further, a more in-depth learning path such as the Advanced Photography Course can help open up that next level of creative and technical control.

Because once the technical foundation is no longer a barrier, creativity has more room to breathe.

Photography as a Language of Reality

There is something unique about photography that no other medium can quite claim in the same way.

Photography begins with reality.

Even when we manipulate, interpret, abstract, layer, print, paint over, or rework the image, the starting point is often something that stood before the lens. A moment. A face. A landscape. A street corner. A shaft of light. A gesture. A shadow. A fragment of life.

Ansel Adams is often quoted as saying:

“Not everybody trusts paintings, but people believe photographs.”

That is a powerful thought, because photography has always carried a relationship with trust. People believe photographs because they are connected to reality. They feel as though something real has been witnessed.

Yet the power of photography is that it can move in two very different directions.

On the one hand, photography can present reality so clearly, so sharply, and so intensely that the photograph can feel even more heightened than reality itself. It can isolate a moment, strengthen it, simplify it, and drive it home with remarkable power.

On the other hand, photography can move so far into artistic interpretation that the viewer may ask, “Is this even a photograph?”

That is the power of the instrument when it is played properly.

The camera can move from reality to abstraction, from documentation to poetry, from evidence to emotion, from what is seen to what is felt.

And this is why photography remains such a remarkable art form.

What Photographic Societies and Camera Clubs May Need to Say More Clearly

This brings me back to camera clubs and photographic societies.

Perhaps the challenge is not simply that younger people are uninterested. Perhaps the challenge is that we are not always explaining the deeper value of photography clearly enough.

My father often used to say, “Don’t sell the steak, sell the sizzle.”

I have always loved that saying, because it applies so perfectly here. Sometimes, in photography clubs and societies, we may be guilty of selling the steak rather than the sizzle. We talk about the camera, the lens, the megapixels, the sensor, the settings, the competitions, the rules, and the technical requirements. All of those things have their place, of course, but they are not the real magic.

The real magic is what photography allows us to do.

It allows us to see differently. It allows us to slow down. It allows us to work with light, mood, movement, depth, emotion, memory, reality, and imagination. It gives us a reason to go out into the world and look more carefully. It gives us a creative language. It gives us community, purpose, and a way to express something that words often cannot.

That is the sizzle.

If people think photography is merely taking pictures, then yes, their phone will seem good enough.

But if they are shown what happens when light is understood, when lenses are used intentionally, when depth is controlled, when motion is interpreted, when exposure becomes expressive, when files are processed with care, and when a photograph is printed beautifully, then something changes.

Put a proper digital camera in someone’s hands. Teach them how to use it. Show them high-key lighting, low-key lighting, long exposure, shallow depth of field, creative movement, intentional blur, abstraction, the artistic interpretation of the camera lens, and the power of the print.

Then show them what is possible.

Suddenly, “let me quickly take a picture on my phone” no longer feels like the whole story.

The person begins to realise that photography is not just an app, a filter, or a device. It is a craft waiting to be mastered.

That, I believe, is the message photography clubs and photographic societies need to promote.

Not simply equipment. Not simply competitions. Not simply scores. Not simply technical critique. But the joy, depth, community, discipline, experimentation, and wonder of photography.

Because if we want people to fall in love with photography, we should not only show them the camera.

We need to show them what the camera can awaken.

Phone Photography Is Not the Enemy

Let me be clear. I am not saying phone photography is bad.

Quite the opposite.

Phone photography is a wonderful medium for experimentation. It is immediate. It is playful. It allows us to make visual notes, test ideas, and capture moments we may otherwise miss. In my own creative world, convenience has value.

But phone photography does not replace serious digital camera photography.

It sits alongside it.

A sketchbook does not replace a finished painting. A voice note does not replace a composed piece of music. A quick snapshot does not replace the experience of making, printing, and presenting a photograph with intention.

Each has its place.

The danger is not the phone. The danger is when we begin to believe that the phone is all there is.

Photography is Certainly Not Dying

So, is digital camera photography dying?

I do not believe it is.

Photography itself is certainly not dying.

But I do believe that the understanding of photography is at risk. The knowledge of why we do it, how we do it, and what makes it meaningful needs to be protected, taught, and shared.

We need to remind people that photography is not only about convenience. It is not only about sharing. It is not only about likes, scrolling, screens, and instant reaction.

Photography is about seeing.

It is about light.

It is about patience.

It is about craft.

It is about reality, transformed through the eye, the heart, the camera, the print, and the final presentation.

And perhaps most importantly, photography is about taking time.

In a world that encourages us to move faster, photography invites us to slow down.

That may be its greatest gift.

Digital camera photography is not dying. High-level photography is not dying. The art of photography is still very much alive.

But we need to keep telling people why it matters.

Because the moment someone sees a beautifully printed photograph on a wall, feels its presence, studies its detail, and understands the thought that went into making it, they realise something very important.

They realise that photography was never just about taking pictures.

It was always about learning how to see.

VISIT MARTIN'S ART GALLERIES

Osner Art Gallery in Hout Bay >>

Online Art & Photography Gallery >>

© 2025 Martin Osner Art. All Rights Reserved

LEARN ART & PHOTOGRAPHY

Martin Osner Photography School in Hout Bay >>

Art Photography Academy (Online Courses) >>

CONTACT

Call: +27 21 790 6494

Mobile: +27 83 472 1717

Email: info@martinosner.com

Lets Stay in Touch